Here are notes from class today;
We looked at terms from the paper. We then applied the terms to a movie clip we watched.
Then we watched a youtube clip about a touch interaction, and applied the terms from the Lacey paper.
Then we had a discussion about novel interactions and symbolism, and a wee bit ‘o speculation about how to think about new systems.
P.S. If someone else has notes, please feel free to add them. You can either add them as a comment or create an entirely new post; however, it might be nice to have all of the notes in this section.
Chung-Ching and Jen ARE AWESOME! Thanks for the discussion.
- Key words from the papers
- Mise-en-scene
- film as a form of art instead of a fade; film as film
- Film in itself
- Diegetic / non-diegetic sound
- What about internal monologue;
- Mise-en-scene
- Verisimilitude: Ablity to construct a real / fake or real / real environment
- Color
- Lighting
- Performance
- Framing
- Depth of Field: What’s in focus
- Angle: how the camera is positioned
- Composition: how the objects are placed in the frame
- Tracking
- Editing
- Camera Height
- Camera Angle
- Sound vs. Noise: Sound is the thing that moves things forwards;
- Units:
- Montage;
- Sets – produce – costume
- Back to the Future Clip
- Team Editing
- One really long composition shot; zoomed in; panning right and then panning out
- One really long shot in the beginning
- His voice was obviously paned over
- Now it’s a shot of looking at him playing with sciency thing and then it engs up begin a giant subwoofer
- At first there was one long shot and then;
- Detail shots; mixed wide-angle
- Things we noticed:
- Zoomed in; new clocks -> old clocks
- Old pics -> inventions
- Close until bottom portion of char
- Height
- High/low
- The long panning shot; Fringe scientist (objects giving us ideas about his life world)
- The plopping the
- At the beginning there is a lot of long shots; and then there a series of frequents cut;
- because our gaze is directed, it’s not overwhelming us with the stageĀ (foreshadowing)
- Audible clues of giving us indicators of things off line
- Digital vs. Analog
- Interaction Design:
- Zoomed in; new clocks -> old clocks
- Team Editing
- Chung-Chings’ touch interaction
- Camera Angle
- Framing
- Wide-Narrow
- No use of depth of field
- There was no sound, less realistic
- At what extent are we directed?
- Directing interaction design
- Objects as actors in IxD
- Chad’s comments;
- Props, stage motivation;
- The Interaction is a stage
- Star as text
- Blocking in film

5 comments
Comments feed for this article
November 4, 2009 at 12:19 am
jeffreybardzell
Sounds like Jen and Chung-Ching were a hit and that class went really well! THANK YOU so much, Jen and Chung-Ching, for investing the time in making this a good experience for everyone (hopefully including yourselves).
And thank you, class, for going and putting in the effort even though the cat was away!
November 4, 2009 at 12:19 am
jeffreybardzell
And, of course, thanks to The Dombro for posting notes! Thanks, “dude”!
November 4, 2009 at 3:49 am
jeffreybardzell
I hereby retract every single nice thing I ever said about Lynn Dombrowski. This blog post is UNCATEGORIZED!
Aired? Watered? Earthed? I think not.
Fired.
November 4, 2009 at 5:47 am
lynndombrowski
I have nothing to retract. :p (and will continue to refer to you as “dude”. You are in Cali, you should be used to it by now!)
Fired? You can’t fire me, because I quit!
Ahem, please note: there is no category for class notes; secondly, I tried removing the “Uncategorized” category or adding a category and wordpress wouldn’t let me because it’s D.U.M.B.
Fourthly: What does “Aired? Watered? Earthed?” even mean?
Meh.
November 4, 2009 at 3:40 pm
jeffreybardzell
You are so right, Lynn! I retract everything I said. Clearly the categories “Film” and “Semiotics” don’t apply to this post about film semiotics! Totally WordPress’ fault.
And, I might be wrong about this, but I think Earthed, Aired, and Watered was a 70s R&B band.
P.S. Added a Class Notes category as well.